Changing circumstances and developing technology bring competition
to every field of our lives and also to education. Apart from public schools,
there is a new phenomenon: shadow education establishments. Thanks to their
increasing success rate, they have a growing customer base. Many believe that
shadow education establishments contribute to both the economy and pupils.
However, others believe that shadow education establishments should be banned.
Supporters of the idea that the shadow education system should not
be banned maintain that pupils need shadow education by virtue of the poor
quality of public education. Public school teachers lack the creativity and
commitment to help students achieve success. However, these problems may be resolved
at shadow education establishments. Not every private institution can provide
good and quality education. New graduates or inexperienced teachers can be employed in
these places. As a result of this, students do not get an adequate education.
According to most advocates, more money means more quality
education. Therefore, affluent people want their children to go to the most expensive institutions because they
believe that their children deserve much more personal attention which
increases their success rate. However, education should be based on an
individual's hard work and not on a family’s bank account. If we look at countries such as Finland and Norway which
have more than 95% of their students in public schools , we see that citizens
in these countries are some of the best educated people in the world. It seems
that they do not have to go to school twice.
All in all, shadow
education establishments should be banned because they increase inequality
between people. Instead of these establishments, public schools must give a
high quality education. This is the only thing we need for a bright future.
No comments:
Post a Comment